Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Discussions Forum
Home Forum Goods and Services Tax - GST This

A Public Forum.
Acknowledging the Value of Experts.

Contribute Your Wisdom, Shape the Future.
Let Your Experience Guide Others

Submit new Issue / Query     My IssuesMy Replies
A free service.
You may submit an issue for brainstorming also.

RCM ON CORPORATE GUARANTEE, Goods and Services Tax - GST

Issue Id: - 118833
Dated: 30-10-2023
By:- ajay chharia

RCM ON CORPORATE GUARANTEE


  • Contents

Dear Sir,

corporate guarantee provided by overseas holding company. As per the CBIC order, 18% GST will apply to corporate guarantees between parent and subsidiaries and other related parties either on the financial consideration charged by the guarantor for that service, or 1% of the value of the guarantee, whichever is higher.

Guarantee was provided in 2017-18, after july,2017

1.whether RCM to be paid on 1% value of Guarantee for 2017-18,

2.If yes, whether liable for interest even when valuation rule was not available till 26th oct,2023

3.Whether ITC can be availed in current year?

pl note:my company is not eligible for 100% ITC

Posts / Replies

Showing Replies 1 to 3 of 3 Records

Page: 1


1 Dated: 30-10-2023
By:- Ganeshan Kalyani

The applicability is prospective.


2 Dated: 31-10-2023
By:- KASTURI SETHI

I agree with Sh.Ganeshan Kalyani Ji.

(i) The department has already issued SCNs to many assessees prior to the issuance of CBIC Order. The present CBIC Order cannot be implemented retrospectively.

(ii) In view of the effective date, the possibility of dropping the proceedings initiated by the department on this very issue cannot be ruled out.

(iii) Let us wait for such instructions from the CBIC in favour of the assessees.


3 Dated: 1-11-2023
By:- Yash Shah

It has to be on prospective basis and even challenge as to the applicability of the recent circular is not out of context, there remains a pertinent question as to how it is supply in first case is still to face the heat of litigation, also mentioning the valuation rule would solve the problem is what the department may think of but larger question is to put in place the mechanism for such levy and "how" could come next.


Page: 1

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Quick Updates:Latest Updates