Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2005 (2) TMI 455

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the business of civil engineering and construction work for industrial units. In the claim for depreciation, the assessee included a sum of Rs. 34,82,091. This was nothing but the cost of scaffolding materials, which were purchased during the previous year. The assessee claimed 100 per cent depreciation on these scaffolding materials on the ground that each item of the material did not exceed Rs. 5,000. The AO called for the details with regard to purchase of these scaffolding materials and he noticed that the scaffolding materials of the value of Rs. 4,19,440 purchased under Bill No. 18 dt.23rd March, 1993from M/s High Reach Construction Equipment (P) Ltd., have been made five days before the close of accounting year. To verify whether th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... order, the assessee has preferred the present appeal before this Tribunal. 4. As far as the facts in asst. yr. 1993-94 are concerned, they are as follows : In this assessment year, the assessee had claimed depreciation at 100 per cent of scaffolding material worth Rs. 22,72,378 which were purchased during the previous year relevant to asst. yr. 1994-95. In this year also, the AO called for the details with regard to the date of purchase of the scaffolding materials and their use for the purpose of business of the assessee. On examination of such details, the AO noticed that the entire scaffolding materials were purchased from companies in Delhi, namely, High Reach Overseas (P) Ltd. and High Reach Construction Equipment (P) Ltd. and also f .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ble. 5. Thus a total value of Rs. 5,94,818 representing the scaffolding materials not used for the purpose of the business of the assessee, was disallowed by the AO. The AO further noticed that goods of the value of Rs. 1,61,418 and Rs. 2,02,866 purchased from Goel Trading Company were purchased under Invoice No.30th March, 1994and31st March, 1994, respectively. The goods received Note in respect of both the invoices were dt.31st March, 1994. The time of delivery of these goods was recorded as4.00 P.M.Since these materials reached the assessee only on31st March, 1994at4.00 P.M., claim for depreciation was disallowed by the AO on the basis that it was highly improbable that the assessee could have used these materials for the purpose of it .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... are of the view that the same can be admitted for adjudication. We will consider this additional ground at the appropriate time. 8. As far as merits of the disallowance made by the Revenue authorities are concerned, the learned counsel relied on the decisions in the case of CIT vs. Refrigeration Allied Industries Ltd. (2000) 163 CTR (Del) 498 : (2001) 247 ITR 12 (Del) and in the case of CIT vs. Geo Tech Construction Corporation (2000) 162 CTR (Ker) 528 : (2000) 244 ITR 452 (Ker). In the aforesaid decision, it has been held by theHon ble Courtthat the word "used for the purpose of business" used in s. 32 for grant of depreciation includes passive user of asset in business also and that if an asset is kept ready for use, then it can be sa .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rials worth Rs. 2,82,700 are concerned, the same were lying in the main office and not dispatched to the site office. Even this would be a case of passive user. Consequently, the entire claim for depreciation for the asst. yr. 1993-94 is directed to be allowed and the disallowance made by the AO is directed to be deleted. Additional ground of appeal raised by the assessee does not require any consideration in view of the above. 11. As far as the asst. yr. 1994-95 is concerned, it is not in dispute that in respect of materials worth Rs. 5,94,818, there was delivery to the assessee only after 31st March, 1993, i.e., after the end of the previous year. In such circumstances, even the theory of passive user cannot sought to be put forth by th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates