1984 (12) TMI 118

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ld be granted. 2. On behalf of the Revenue Mr. A. P. Saxena submitted that for the asst. yr. 1977-78 the assessee was asked to produce evidence regarding filing of Form No. 11 as well as the partnership deed. The assessee could not produce the receipt which was issued by the department in acknowledgement of having received Form No. 11 and the partnership deed. The assessee, therefore, requested .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... , Mr. Saxena submitted, the AAC observed in his order that the ITO was not in a position to disprove the facts stated by the assessee in his affidavit and at the same time it was also not able to prove that the entry in the Inward Register was not a genuine one. The AAC was of the view that the assessee cannot be penalised for any overwriting done by some clerk and if at all any benefit of doubt h .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nt is doubting its own records and there has been no finding by the officer concerned in respect of entry in the Inward Register to be false. He again relied on the Ahmedabad Bench decision, and supported the order of the AAC. For the second year, he relied on the orders of the AAC. 4. We have heard the parties. In the case of Jankidas Chandratan, Ahmedabad vs. ITO, Circle II-D (Spl.), Ahmedabad .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X