Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1985 (6) TMI 102

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ctor of Central Excise, Calcutta, which on transfer to this Tribunal was treated as an appeal before this Tribunal and is now being disposed of accordingly. 2. The facts of the case, in brief, are that on the basis of some information, the Central Excise Officers of Calcutta VII Division visited the factory of M/s. B.K. Engineering Company (hereinafter referred to as the appellants) on 3-6-1974 and noticed that the appellants were manufacturing 24 Volts D.C. Armature without obtaining L-4 licence from the Central Excise Department. According to the Officers those goods were liable to Central Excise duty under Item 30(4) of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. On examination of the factory s challans and bills .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... contended that the goods manufactured by them were not complete armatures, but were armature windings and that those were not complete armatures as the ball bearings, retaining plates. Fibre Washers, fixing Screws, locking nuts etc. were not supplied to the buyers alongwith those armature windings which were further processed by turning the commutator etc. elsewhere by M/s. Advanced Apparatus and M/s. Jayshree Supply Agency to whom the goods were sold by the appellants. They argued that as the process of manufacture was not completed by them and they removed the goods in an unfinished condition, Central Excise duty was not payable by them, but it was to be paid by M/s. Advanced Apparatus and M/s. Jayshree Supply Agency who completed the ma .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rmature winding manufactured by them could not be put to use in D.C. Motors. The learned Advocate further argued that an armature of D.C. Motor becomes complete after the processes of laminations, core assembly, winding, grinding and varnishing are done. He submitted a copy of Supplement to the Manual of Departmental Instructions on Excisable Manufactured Products-Electric Fans, published by the Central Board of Revenue (which is marked for departmental use only) and has drawn our attention to pages 27, 28 and 29 thereof in support of his arguments. He concluded by saying that as the appellants did not manufacture and remove complete and finished armature, no duty was payable by them under item 30 (4) of the Central Excise Tariff. 7. The .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... obtained about 10 years ago and those produced by the learned Advocate were manufactured in the recent past. 9. We have carefully considered the arguments of both sides. We have also inspected the samples produced before us and after inspection of the same we are convinced that the product manufactured by the appellants required further processing of grinding/turning the commutator and varnishing. This processing was not done by the appellants before clearance of the goods from their factory. Admittedly, the process of grinding or turning and also varnishing was done by M/s. Advanced Apparatus and Jayshree Supply Agency to whom the appellants supplied their product. We are also convinced that without this processing, armature windings man .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates