Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1986 (3) TMI 226

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... in terms of power vested in his under Section 35E(2) of the Act, issued an authorisation vide his letter No. V(68)3-200/83/RC dt. 12-6-1984 (authorisation letter has been signed on 6-6-1984) directing the appellant to file an appeal with this office. In the said appeal, the appellant say and submit that he has erred in vacating the show cause notice 11-3-1983 demanding duty of Rs.157397.76 issued by the Supdt. Central Excise, Range-II Baroda Dn.II to M/s Perfect Engineering Works, Makarpure Road (herein after referred to as Respondents) on the grounds that they were eligible for exemption as envisaged under Notification No. 105/80 Central Excise, dated 19-6-1980 as after deducting sales tax and other taxes the value of clearances does not .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... and against the principles of natural justice. They say that they have been submitting monthly and yearly returns to the proper officer. These documents have been signed as token of acceptance of facts and as such there is no ground for willful non-submission or suppression of facts or fraud and hence the period of 5 years under Section 11 A cannot be applied. They argued that none of the Central Excise Officer has asked for inclusion of the cost of raw materials for job charges. They were not aware of the Board s Order dated 26-6-1981. In view of this submission, the subject Show Cause Notice issued to them is completely incorrect and should therefore be discharged. The personal hearing was fixed for 8-11-1985. The respondents requested fo .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... grounds are beyond the scope of show cause notice. If these grounds are considered, it will result into gross violation of natural justice, and making out altogether a new case by the department against the respondents, which is not permissible under the relevant laws. In support of this contention they relied on the decisions (i) XACA (India) Pvt. Ltd., v. U.O.I. (1980 E.L.T. 2277) (ii) Wimco Ltd., v. U.O.I. (1980 E.L.T. 235) (iii) M/s Golden Tobacco Co. Ltd. v. U.O.I. (1983 E.L.T. 2238) (iv) M/s Bush (India) Ltd. v. U.O.I. (1980 E.L.T. 258), (v) JBA Printing Inks Ltd. v. U.O.I. (1980 E.L.T. 121) all of Bombay High Court and (vi) Lakhanpal National Co. v. Collector of Customs 1983 E.L.T., 1830 (Tribunal). They also relied on Honourable Sup .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... eceeding financial year i.e. 1980-81 and thereby the respondents were not eligible for exemption for the clearances made during the year 1981-82. The appellant under his order No. 47/MP/83 dated 12-5-1983 has correctly vacated the Show Cause Notice on the ground that the sales tax is deductible from the assessable value and therefore out of consideration for computing the value of clearances for eligibility of exemption. The appellant has rightly decided that the assessable value is to be determined under the provisions of Section 4 and whatever deductions are permissible under Section 4 are equally applicable for invoice price under Notification No. 120/75. The Honorable Tribunal has also taken the same view in case of Collector of Central .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e. The appeal in question is also hit by limitation in terms of amendment made in Section 35E(3) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, by substituting the period of two years to One year in the announcement of Finance Bill for 1984-85 and enacted in the parliament with effect from 11-5-1984. As in the instant case, the jurisdictional Collector Central Excise has issued authorisation on 6th June 1984 for directing the appellant to file an appeal for review of his order in original No. 47/MP/83 dated 12-5-1983 that is after a lapse of one year. The Honourable Tribunal in case of Ashoka Foundry, Dhanbad v. Collector of Central Excise, Patna reported in 1985 ECR October 1767 has observed that review proceeding commenced after expiry of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates