9911796707
TMI Blog1987 (5) TMI 152X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... - The appellants M/s Food Corporation of India Ltd. imported by s.s. Buchenstain one case of spares for Bullar machine under bill of entry Cash No. 3112 of 13-4-1981. Duty charged therefor and collected was Rs. 89,176.69 paise. Subsequently they filed a refund claim for Rs. 58,366.91 paise, the ground claim being mentioned therein as excess duty charged on replaced parts . This claim was reject ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e difference between the amount of duty collected now and the amount of duty collected earlier. It is against the said order that the present appeal has been filed. 2. We have heard Shri D.N. Mehta Advocate for the appellants and Shri Vineet Kumar for the Deptt. 3. Under letter dated 29-4-1987 the appellants had enclosed what they have described as certain additional grounds to be urged in the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... re not claiming the right of clearance free of duty. He points out that on the assessment as made by the authorities under the headings mentioned in the bill of entry the entitlement for benefit of concessional duty under notification 281/76 as amended should have been considered, but had not been considered, by the lower authorities. 4. Since the case of the appellants appears to have been disp ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
