9911796707
TMI Blog2009 (6) TMI 391X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nt Service rendered. The period involved is 2001-2005. The Id. DR submits that even if law is not applicable for a part of the period that shall apply to the rest of the part of the period assessed. - Following the ratio laid down by the Apex Court in the case of J. K. Synthetic Ltd. reported in 1996 (86) E.L.T. 472 (S.C.), we restore the stay application to remove hardship to the appellant, in vi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rt for hearing in time. Therefore, he has moved this application to remove the difficulties that the appellant has faced. He further submits that when the appellant has merit in their case, it shall suffer if the stay application is not restored. 2. Ld. DR had no objection for the restoration application for the difficulties expressed by the ld. Consultant. 3. So far as the merit is concerned, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... . CCE, Jaipur reported in 2008 (11) S.T.R. 338 (Tri.-LB) and appreciating ratio laid down by the High Court of Bombay in the case of Indian National Shipowners Association reported in 2009 (13) S.T.R. 235 (Bom.), we waive the requirement of pre-deposit during the pendency of appeal. Misc. Application is allowed as well as stay matter disposed recalling order dated 27-4-09. (Dictated Pron ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
