2010 (3) TMI 71

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... urpreet Singh, Senior Central Government Standing Counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Jagmohan Bansal, Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 to 5. Adarsh Kumar Goel, J. 1. This petition seeks quashing of order dated 28.12.2007, Annexure P.4 passed by the Customs and Central Excise Settlement Commission under the provisions of Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short, 'the 1944 Act'). 2. Respondent No.2 asses .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the rival claims of the parties, passed an order under section 32F(5) of the 1944 Act directing the assessee to pay amount of Rs.31,88,629/- towards duty with interest, redemption fine and penalty but granted immunity from prosecution and waived part of interest, redemption fine and penalty. It was further held that the revenue was entitled to return the amount of Rs.35,38,521/- being the value o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... sel for the assessee submits that adjudicating authority having not made any adjudication, the goods having neither been confiscated nor returned, the Settlement Commission was justified in giving effect to order of this Court by directing return of value of goods which was incidental to its main order. 7. In view of undisputed facts that the goods of the assessee were seized and were neither con .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X