Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2008 (10) TMI 333

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ee has not paid the same during the previous year relevant the assessment year and that as per section 43B, any sum payable by the assessee could be allowed as a deduction in computing income of that previous year in which the same is actually paid. It also claimed deduction of Rs. 2,31,38,952 being the replacement cost of the machinery as a revenue expenditure. The Commissioner held that it was n .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d in the circumstances of the case, the Income-tax Tribunal is right in law in holding that disallowance under section 43B on the contributions towards gratuity fund after the close of the previous year was allowable? (ii) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal is right in law in holding that a sum of Rs.2,31,38,953 claimed as expenditure on .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... as revenue expenditure and the disallowance of payment towards gratuity fund was deleted. Aggrieved by the same, the Department filed appeal, which was dismissed. 4. The first question is covered by the decision of the apex court in CIT v. Vinay Cement Ltd. [2007] 213 CTR 268; [2009] 313 1TR (St.) 1 wherein the Supreme Court has held that the assessee is entitled to claim the benefit un .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... city remaining constant even after replacement, the matter needs to be remitted to the Commissioner (Appeals). There is one more reason why we are inclined to remit the matter. As stated above, the impugned judgment of the Madras High Court in the case of CIT v. Janakiram Mills Ltd. [2005] 275 ITR 403 has been set aside by this court as there was confusion between the tests to be applied in re .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... applicable. We express no opinion on the aforestated contentions at this stage. It is for the Commissioner to decide the aforestated questions and contentions raised by the Department as well as by the assessee. The Commissioner will decide the matter uninfluenced by any observations made in the impugned judgment of the High Court Liberty to the parties to adduce additional evidence." 6. The .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates