2010 (3) TMI 268

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... that- we consider that thee was no need for insisting for any pre-deposit of penalty for hearing. Accordingly, we waive the requirement of pre-deposit of penalty and allow the stay petition. - ST/198/08 - - - Dated:- 22-3-2010 - Mr. Ashok Jindal, Member (Judicial) and Mr. B.S.V. Murthy, Member (Technical) Shri R.Nair, Shri Amrish Neema, Advocates for Assessee. Shri S.K. Mall, SDR for .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ing pre-deposit of 50% when compared with the observations on Page No.6. However, in view of the fact that the appellant is a public sector financial institution, we consider that thee was no need for insisting for any pre-deposit of penalty for hearing. Accordingly, we waive the requirement of pre-deposit of penalty and allow the stay petition. Further, sine the Commissioner (Appeals) has not pas .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X