1991 (12) TMI 171

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... )]. This is an application for rectification of the mistake alleged to have crept in the order No. 293/91-A. 2. The appellants main contention is that in the main appeal they have advanced an argument that a quantity discount was available on the price of 1159 Japanese Yen and if the quantity discount available for 4,10,000 pieces was taken into consideration, the net value would be the s .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... iven and the import was made at a price less than 1159 Yen. 3. Shri Prabhat Kumar appearing for the Department submitted that there is no error apparent on the face of the order and therefore ROM is not maintainable. His further argument that the argument advanced by the appellants if considered would amount to reviewing in the order which Tribunal is not competent to do. 4. On a consideration .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X