Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1993 (2) TMI 209

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... This appeal is against the order of the Collector (Appeals), Madras. Collector (Appeals) has allowed the appeal of the Respondent and held that duty could not be demanded from the Respondent in respect of the goods which were despatched under Chapter X procedure to the consignee and not been properly accounted for after despatch from the factory of the Respondent. The appellant-Collector has urged .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... proviso to Rule 49 of Central Excise Rules, 1944. If this alternative is also not held proper, perhaps there is no rule under which duty can be demanded from a manufacturer who has cleared the goods at nil rate of duty under the guise of the procedure laid down in Chapter X of Central Excise Rules, 1944 and failed to produce the proof of transfer of the possession of the goods at the receiving en .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e Industrial units who had obtained L 6 licences from the authorities entitling them to receive the goods for the specified industrial purposes as set out in the relevant notification. These consignments according to the authorities did not reach the consignees concerned as there was no acknowledgment in regard to the receipt of those consignments received from the said consignor and duty was, the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... case. The learned appellant-Collector in his grounds of appeal has not spelt out as to how the reasoning of the learned Collector (Appeals) is faulty and has merely urged that when there is a exemption under Rule 8(1) of the Central Excise Rules subject to the compliance with the provisions of Chapter X, it is the manufacturer alone who has to be held responsible for payment of duty on the goods. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t to a consignee who holds a valid L 6 licence. The Revenue in such a situation is secured by execution of the bond by the L 6 license holder for due accountal of the goods for the specified use and if he is not able to do that it is he alone who should be called upon to pay the duty due unless it is shown that the consignor i.e. the manufacturer is bound himself by a bond in this regard. There is .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates