1996 (10) TMI 301

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d. Shri M.P. Devnath, Advocate appeared for the appellants. Shri Nanak Chand, JDR represented the respondent/Revenue. 2. It is seen that the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) had passed his order dismissing the appeal as time barred under Section 35 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. 3. The ld. Advocate submits that the order passed by the Asstt. Collector had not been served on th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rejected as time barred. It is the settled position of law that even before the appeal is dismissed as time barred, an opportunity is required to be given to the appellants to explain the delay and the matter had to be discussed before their application is rejected. In this case, the order appeared against was dated 30-11-1984 but the copy on the strength of which appeal was filed was attested by .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X