9911796707
TMI Blog1997 (12) TMI 311X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... , for the Appellants. Shri S. Nunthuk, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : G.A. Brahma Deva, Member (J)]. - This stay application is filed by the applicants for the waiver of pre-deposit of duty amounting to Rs. 8,28,547/- and penalty of Rs. 4 lakhs on the proprietary concern and Rs. 1 lakh on the proprietor respectively and stay of the recovery proceedings. 2. Arguing for the appellan ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... hat the decision referred to above is not applicable to the facts of this case since in that case it was a conversion of wire into wire whereas in this case there is conversion of rod into wire. Wire becomes altogether a different commodity from the rod and accordingly the department was justified in raising the demand on the commodity which emerged. 4. We have carefully considered the matte ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... appellant's unit. Accordingly we direct the party to deposit a sum of Rs. 10,000/- and Rs. 1 lakh towards disputed duty amount and penalty respectively on or before 30-1-1998, failing which the appeal is liable to be dismissed without any further notice. In case compliance is made on or before 30-1-1998, the balance amount of duty and penalty is dispensed with and recovery proceedings are hereby s ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
