1998 (2) TMI 186

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... : Shiben K. Dhar, Member (T)]. This appeal is directed against order-in-original dated 18-1-1990 of Additional Collector of Central Excise, Rajkot. 2. The Appellants are alleged to have removed Typewriter Ribbons without discharging duty. 3. Arguing on behalf of the Appellants the ld. Counsel submits that the impugned goods were in the nature of only slitted cotton fabrics and had not at .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e, uninked fabrics are also liable to duty in terms of Heading 96.12. It is the contention of the appellants that what they supplied were mere slitted cotton fabrics which had not undergone any of the operations such as would convert them into the typewriter ribbons. The statement of Shri Deora, Proprietor of the Crown Stationers, makes it very clear that essential processes were carried out only .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X