1997 (3) TMI 275

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ]. The short point to be considered in this appeal is whether item Fuel Injector imported by the appellants is classifiable under 84.06 as claimed by the party or under 84.10 as per the department. 2. Heard Shri K. Kumar, ld. Advocate for the appellants and the department was represented by Shri K. Srivastava, ld. DR. 3. Originally the assessment of Fuel Injector was made under 84.10. Sh .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tion of Fuel Pumps under 84.10 as it was held by the department. 4. Heard Shri K. Srinivasan. Shri Srinivasan also submitted that it is correct that the orders passed by the authorities below have not dealt with reference to the item Fuel Injector but decided the issue with reference to Fuel Pump. 5. We have carefully considered the submissions and perused the records. Though the specific clai .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X