9911796707
TMI Blog1998 (2) TMI 266X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... [Order per : Lajja Ram, Member (T)]. These are two appeals filed by M/s. Delton Cables Ltd. being aggrieved with a common order-in-appeal passed by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), New Delhi. In her order-in-appeal, the adjudicating authority had dismissed two appeals on the ground that the appeals had been filed beyond the statutory time limit prescribed under the Central Excise ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d order. He prayed for dismissal of the appeal. 4. We have carefully considered the matter. The matter related to refund claims. The adjudicating authority after observing the principles of natural justice deducted certain amounts from the refund claims and allowed the rest of the claims. He observed that the goods in respect of which the refund claim was not allowable had been supplied by the m ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... had been received in the Office of the Asstt. Collector on 17-1-1986. We find that in one case the adjudication order was received by the appellants on 1-10-1985 and in another case it was received on 9-10-1985. By the time the first letter was written, the three months period for filing the appeals was already over. 6. The Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) had gone through the appellants ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... cise v. Akry Rasayan - 1997 (89) E.L.T. 81 (Tribunal). We find that in both these appeals no sufficient grounds have been established for filing the appeals late. The only ground taken is that they wanted some more information from the adjudicating authority. We find that these requests have also been made when the period for filing the appeal was already over. 8. In the facts and circumstances ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
