1998 (8) TMI 157

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... REPRESENTED BY : None, for the Appellant. Shri Satnam Singh, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Jyoti Balasundaram, Member (J)]. In this case a duty demand of Rs. 32,920.24 has been confirmed on pharmaceutical products falling under Chapter 30 of the Schedule to the CETA, 1985 and a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- has been imposed on the appellants herein holding that they have violated .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... imed that they had clearly marked the control samples as not for sale; but the only condition of Sl. No. 24, Col. 5 of Notification 171/70 which was not observed by them, was that they did not pack the samples in a different packing from trade pack. They have been consistently claiming that the control samples were drawn as per the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and such samples were meant for rete .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X