Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1998 (9) TMI 259

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... )]. Question involved in this appeal is whether the Rovings of glass fibre manufactured by the appellants herein and captively used for making chopped strand mats and Woven Rovings are liable to duty or not. The sole issue involved in this case is whether the rovings captively used by the appellants are marketable or not. It is admitted by the appellants that rovings in general are saleable .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... m a book titled Manufacturing Technology of Continuous Glass Fibres by K.L. Loewnstein. For the sake of better appreciation we reproduce the extracts given in the impugned order. The starting materials for chopped strand mats are glass fibre cakes or rovings suitable for chopping. Most Glass fibre manufacturers use cakes entirely, although some often use rovings, in part to save floor space. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ate. The suitability, as already pointed out by the appellants in the classification list, is in terms of chemicals used, amount of yield and the process of manufacture. Ld. Advocate further, submits that it is the Revenue s responsibility to show that the rovings used by the appellants are marketable as has been held by the Supreme Court in the case of Moti Laminates reported in 1995 (76) E.L.T. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rent from features of rovings which are marketed as admitted to the appellants. Further, these features are so different as to make rovings which are used captively unmarketable also requires to be proved by the appellants. This onus, submits the JDR, has not been discharged by the appellants. He, therefore, submits that the appeal deserves to be dismissed. 6. We have carefully considered the pl .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates