Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1998 (12) TMI 240

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rances of I.V. Cannula valued at Rs. 1,22,60,000/- for misclassification, misdeclaration as Disposable and non disposable cannula for aorta, Vene Cause and similar veins and blood vessels in terms of G.E. No. 121 notification No. 23/98-Cus. with a view to wrongly avail benefit of exemption notification and clear goods at Nil rate of duty on the Bill of Entries No. 218025 dated 21-8-1998, 110737 dated 29-7-1998 and 215634 dated 1-8-1998. Over and above this, the statement of Shri Sunil Nanda and Sh. Rajeev Malik was recorded under section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962, in which they admitted the facts of misclassification; misdeclaration on the said Bill of Entries filed by him on behalf of the importer. Thus; while doing so, the CHA - .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rder do not fall within the description contained therein or have been misclassified or misdeclared and in any event, passing of an order under Regulation 21(2) is not justified. He relies upon the decision of the Calcutta High Court in the case of N.C. Singha Sons v. Union of India reported in 1998 (104) E.L.T. 11 (Cal.), Madras High Court decision in the case of East West Freight Carrier P. Ltd. reported in 1995 (77) E.L.T. 79 (Mad.) and the decisions of the Tribunal reported in 1993 (68) E.L.T. 419 in the case of Eagle Shipping (India) Services, 1994 (50) ECR 319 in the case of Trinity Shipping and Allied Services and 1998 (98) E.L.T. 275 in the case of Vikas Shipping Agency v. Collector of Customs, Bombay in support of his arguments a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... power to suspend the Licence is to be exercised where immediate action is necessary, and quashed the order of suspension as a plain reading of the same did not show that the Collector had applied his mind to consider whether immediate action was necessary in the case. The same view has been taken by the Hon ble Calcutta High Court in the case of N.C. Singha and Sons v. Union of India reported in 1998 (104) E.L.T. 11 (Cal.) wherein the Court has held that : `Undoubtedly a plain reading of the Regulation 21(2) clearly stipulates that the requirement to take immediate action is a sini qua non to the suspension of a licence under Regulation 21(2) because such suspension is not by way of any punishment, as is contemplated by Regulation 21(2), .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he present case, we do not find any indication of the necessity for immediate action and the alleged contravention of Regulation 14 is the subject matter for enquiry under Regulation 23 and does not by itself constitute the requirement of immediate action under Regulation 21(2). 4.1 The decision of the Hon ble Calcutta High Court in the case of Collector of Customs v. Jeena and Company reported in 1990 (45) E.L.T. 72 (Cal.) relied upon by the learned DR is distinguishable - in that case the suspension order stated as under : 2. Under the circumstances two senior personnel of the writ petitioner No. 1 Sri K.K. Bhattacharji and Janardan Thakur were arrested. The Collector of Customs G. Sarangi issued on 26th August 1986 an order suspendin .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... had the original certificate prepared in his office and had it signed by one Sri Tapas Krishna Chakrabarty, who was a transport contractor and handled cargo for M/s. Jeena Co. It was subsequently stated that during search of the premises of M/s. Jeena Co. and rubber stamp of the supplier at Srinagar had been recovered which according to the Collector of Customs, Sri G. Sarangi, appears to have been used for embossing the country of origin certificate prepared for the clearance of the aforesaid consignment. It had further been stated in the said order that both Mr. J. Thakur of M/s. Jeena Co. and Mr. K.K. Bhattacharji had been arrested in connection with the said seizure and had been remanded to Jail Custody by the Judicial Magistrate .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates