1999 (5) TMI 126

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... [Order per : Jyoti Balasundram, Member (J)]. - The issue in this case relates to redetermination of Annual Capacity of Production of the Induction Furnace of the appellants firm. 2. The ACP of the appellant was determined as 9600 m.t. The assessee increased his production capacity and accordingly the ACP was redetermined as 20,800 m.t. They requested for redetermination of duty liability un .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... duction. 3. We have heard Shri J.S. Agarwal, ld. Advocate and Shri Satnam Singh, ld. SDR. We find that it has already been decided by the Tribunal in the case of Minakshi Castings Inder Steels Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE, Kanpur reported in 1999 (32) R.L.T. 82 that Section 3A(4) is in conflict with Rule 96ZO(3) and whenever there is conflict in between section and the rule, the section prevails over the ru .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... f the appellants did not furnish the data as required under the Act and Rules and as directed to be furnished by the Tribunal in its remand order, then the plea of the assessee that their duty liability would be different from what had been arrived at on the basis of actual would fail as unsubstantiated but this is not the ground for rejection of the plea of the assessee for redetermination of dut .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X