1998 (8) TMI 339

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... l filed by the department against the decision of the Collector (Appeals) who by the impugned order has held that the demand made by the Assistant Collector was barred by limitation. 2. The respondents are engaged in the manufacture of excisable goods falling under Chapter 85 of CETA, 1985. The respondents applied under Rule 57H(3) for transfer of credit lying in RG 23 Part II to RG 23A Part II. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X