1999 (2) TMI 229

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... , for the Applicants. Shri Sanjeev Srivastava, JDR, for the Respondents. [Order per : P.C. Jain, Vice President]. Both sides point out that the issue involved in the present stay applications is whether the provisions of Section 3A(4) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 enjoining upon the Collector to determine the duty liability of the applicants on the basis of actual production or on .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... wer liability based on actual production pending decision of the appeals. 4. We have heard the learned JDR. 5. We agree with the submission of the learned Advocate, Shri R. Santhanam insofar as Venus Ltd. is concerned. Collector will not collect more than the duty liability devolving upon the appellants in terms of Section 3A(4) pending decision of the appeals. 6. Stay petitions disposed of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X