9911796707
TMI Blog1997 (11) TMI 353X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r per : S.S. Kang, Member (J)]. When the case was called, none appeared on behalf of the appellants. Vide their communication dated 22-10-1997, the appellants made a request to decide the appeal on merits. 2. The appellants filed this appeal against the order-in-appeal dated 6-9-1990 passed by the Collector, Central Excise (Appeals), Bombay. In the impugned order, the Collector, Central Ex ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the Tribunal in the case of the appellants own case in Appeal No. E/2993/90-D, the Tribunal vide Final Order No. E/309/91-D, dated 4-7-1991 held that since serial No. 10 of the Notification No. 52/86-C.E. does not differentiate between woven and non-woven fabrics, the exemption granted under the said notification will be applicable equally to non-woven fabrics also. 6. The appeal filed by the R ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
