9911796707
TMI Blog1999 (12) TMI 196X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rency of Rs. 56,500.00 recovered from Shri Kamarujjaman Sarkar has been confiscated absolutely under Sections 111(b) and 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962 on the ground that the same has been illegally imported from Bangladesh in contravention of the provisions of Customs Act, 1962 read with the provisions of the Foreign Exchange Regulations Act. 2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that on 24-1-1996, Shri Kamarujjaman Sarkar was intercepted by the BSF Officers near Border Post and was found to carry Indian Currency of Rs. 56,500.00 along with a packet of Navy Mark cigarettes of Bangladeshi origin. The Officers on a reasonable belief that the Indian Currency has been brought by him from Bangladesh, seized the same. The appellant in h ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... that a cigarette packet of Bangladeshi origin was also recovered from the pocket of the second appellant; and that the documents produced along with the reply to the show cause notice were not produced at the time of seizure. Apart from confiscation of the seized Indian Currency, penalty of Rs. 10,000.00 each was also imposed on both the appellants. Appeals against the above Order failed before the first appellate authority. Hence the present appeals before the Tribunal. 5. Shri P.K. Ghosh, learned Consultant appearing for both the appellants submits that Shri Abdul Aziz Sarkar is a dealer in jute products and holds a valid certificate from the Gram Panchayat and Bazar Samity for carrying out the trading business; that the appellant made ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... o the show cause notice, he submits that no evidence has been relied upon in the show cause notice which only makes allegation of importation of Indian Currency from Bangladesh. He, further, submits that though denying that the cigarette was recovered from the appellant, he submits that even if that be so, this fact by itself cannot lead to the inevitable conclusion that the appellant had been to Bangladesh and had illicitly brought the Indian Currency. As such, submits the learned Consultant that the entire case is based on surmises and conjectures and not on sound legal evidence. In these circumstances, he prays for setting aside the impugned Order and allowing the appeals. 6. Countering the arguments, Shri T. Premkumar, learned SDR sub ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... by the appellant, who claimed that he was intercepted while travelling in a bus near Jalangi Bazar which is 30 Kilometres from Indo-Bangladesh Border. However, I find that nothing turns on this, inasmuch as Shri Kamarujjaman Sarkar in his statement recorded before the Customs Officers under the provisions of Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962, had deposed that the money was collected by him on behalf of Shri Abdul Aziz Sarkar from one Shri Hiralal Sarkar of Calcutta on account of the business dealings between the two. The Deputy Commissioner s reasoning that Abdul Aziz Sarkar claimed the ownership of the Indian Currency on 20-5-1996, thus making the claim as doubtful, cannot be appreciated inasmuch as the person from whose possession the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
