9911796707
TMI Blog2000 (3) TMI 422X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... atil, advocate for the applicants, it appeared that on a short point of law the main appeal itself could be taken up for disposal. This was done after granting waiver of pre-deposit of Rs. 2,08,478/- confirmed as duty and Rs. 7,000/- imposed as penalty. 2. The Assistant Commissioner vide his order dated 28-11-1997 disposed of two show cause notices before him. Notice dated 22-5-1995 sought to de ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... de an application for stay of waiver of the pre-deposit. The Commissioner (Appeals) in his order dated 3-2-1999 observed that the facts were free from doubt and directed 50% of the disputed amount to be deposited. The assessees then filed a subsequent application dated 25-2-1999. In this submission they had stated that in identical circumstances the Commissioner (Appeals) had upheld their pleas. I ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... otice were supplied on 22-9-1995 which were not taken cognizance of by the Assistant Commissioner. I also find that the Assistant Commissioner did not pay any heed to the citations made before him as regards the defects pointed out in the second named show cause notice. Even then the learned Commissioner in his said order directed pre-deposit. It appears that neither of the authorities in this cas ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
