2000 (9) TMI 466

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . Bodade, JDR, for the Respondents. [Order per : Gowri Shankar, Member (T)]. The appellant at the relevant time manufactured heat exchangers and claimed the benefit of exemption contained in entry 8 of the Table to Notification 51/93. This exempts all goods classifiable under chapter heading 84.19 of the Tariff other than machinery, plant, and laboratory equipment for the treatment of ma .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the date on which Notification 83/93 was issued). He found that the appellant had paid the duty at 10% ad valorem and set aside the demand for duty in excess of the duty payable of 15%. Hence this appeal. 3. The appellant is absent and unrepresented and requests decision on merits. 4. The contention in the appeal that the goods are not machinery for the treatment of materials by cooling or con .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X