9911796707
TMI Blog2000 (10) TMI 409X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... or Advocate, for the Respondents. [Order per : Gowri Shankar, Member (T)]. The appellant is engaged in the manufacture of ethylene, propylene, butadiene, toluene and other products. It had claimed benefit of notifications 190/75, 75/84, 27/89 and 102/90 during the various periods with which this appeal is concerned. These notifications provide partial exemption from duty to raw naphtha u ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... terms of Rule 196 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. Penalty was also proposed. The Collector after considering the cause shown and hearing the appellant confirmed the demand for duty. Hence this appeal. 2. The appellant had followed the Chapter X procedure as required by the notifications. It had applied for and obtained a licence specified in Rule 192, (generally known as L-6 licence). Rule 1 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... not used for the purpose and in the manner stated in the application. Hence provisions of Rule 196 could not have been invoked. 4. The applicant had made two applications for the issue of L-6 licence. The first was made on 11-7-1977. In this application seven products were stated by it to be intended to be manufactured out of raw naphtha in respect of which the concession was sought, of which ca ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ncessional rate of duty under Notification 37/73 to toluene received by the assessee under Chapter X procedure because it was used in the manufacture of goods other than those specified in the notification. It was used in the manufacture of thinner, which is not one of the goods not specified in the notification. The Tribunal found that the application made by Arti Paints and Chemicals Industries ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
