9911796707
TMI Blog2001 (6) TMI 348X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ember (T)]. In these four appeals preferred by the Revenue, the issue involved is whether the various products manufactured by M/s. S.A.E. (India) Ltd. are excisable under the provisions of Central Excise Act. When the matters were called, no one was present on behalf of the respondents inspite of notice. As the two appeals are very old, being filed in 1993 and also in view of the fact that ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the process carried out by the respondents does not amount to manufacture. Ld. DR mentioned that the Larger Bench of the Supreme Court recently in the case of Collector of Central Excise, Jaipur v. Man Structurals Ltd., [2001 (130) E.L.T. 401 (S.C.) = 2001 (44) RLT 113 (S.C.)] has remanded the matter to the Appellate Tribunal for disposal afresh after deciding whether the structurals that the Dep ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s also referred to its earlier two decisions in the case of Moti Laminates Pvt. Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise, Ahmedabad [1995 (76) E.L.T. 241 (S.C.)] and Union of India Anr. v. The Delhi Cloth and General Mills Company Ltd. Anr. etc. [1997 (91) E.L.T. 23 (S.C.) = 1997 (19) RLT 475 (S.C.)]. We observe that all the impugned order in the present appeals were passed in 1992 and both lower aut ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
