Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1955 (10) TMI 20

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ons which are not disclosed here, but which one can imagine, the company passed a resolution for its voluntary winding up and the Rajasthan Government which was a creditor of the company in various sums applied for compulsory winding up which was ordered and Mr. K.L. Goel, an advocate of Rajasthan High Court, was appointed its official, liquidator. On the 28th December, 1954, an application was made by various creditors and contributories under section 153 of the Indian Companies Act stating that they had made an arrangement with Amar Nath Mehrotra of Messrs. Amar Nath Mehrotra Co. of Sitapur for running the company. Consequently, on the 4th February, the learned District Judge agreed to this course and ordered that necessary meetings b .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... eme was rejected by the learned Judge is not adequate because Amar Nath Mehrotra was present in court on the 4th February, 1955, and stated that he had given a cheque for Rs. 10,000 to the Rajasthan Government in full and final settlement of the amount due to the labourers working in the factory and he also stated that negotiations were going on and it was for this reason that the proceedings were adjourned to the 25th. It appears that his counsel was present on that day, but it is correct that he did not appear on the 12th of March, and at that stage counsel for the Rajasthan Government seems to have insisted that Amar Nath Mehrotra being absent he must be taken not to be serious in the implementation, of the scheme. But Amar Nath Mehrotra .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... f Amar Nath Mehrotra in this court and he is present before me today. Today counsel for the Rajasthan Government has come forward with new objections and states that his Government is anxious that somebody else, Lal Chand-Johri Mal, should be allowed to run the factory and that instead of Amar Nath Mehrotra they should be the financiers. This is a matter which really has to be decided by the contributories as well as by the creditors and they have already given their opinion about it. Besides a sub-committee appointed by the creditors of the company to consider the financial position of the intended financiers, i.e., Amar Nath Mehrotra and F. Lal Chand Johri Mal, had by a resolution dated the 28th April, 1954, decided to accept financia .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates