Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1963 (1) TMI 27

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... on of the company court was not obtained in accordance with section 171 read with section 232 of the Indian Companies Act. Learned judge in the court below passed an order declaring the sale to be void and the appeal is preferred against that order by the decreeholder auction-purchaser. The facts leading up to this dispute are these: The decreeholder obtained a mortgage decree on a mortgage executed by defendants Nos. 1 to 4 and the husbands of defendants Nos. 14 and 15 in 1934, for a sum of Rs. 7,600. After this mortgage, defendants Nos. 1 to 4 sold the equity of redemption to defendants Nos. 5 and 6 (half and half) with directions to redeem the mortgage. Defendants Nos. 7 to 11 in the suit were alienees of the half share of the equity o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rt in charge of liquidation of the company before any suit or other proceeding is instituted against the company after the order for winding up had been made. Section 232 of the Indian Companies Act (section 537 of the new Companies Act) declares any attachment or execution put in force without leave of the court after the company has been ordered to be wound up against the estate or effects of the company shall be void. There can be no dispute on the authorities that an execution proceeding for executing a mortgage decree over property in which the Hanuman Bank Ltd., the company in liquidation, had a puisne mortgage, would be a proceeding against the company within the meaning of section 171. The further question whether such an execution .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... age interest in the equity of redemption for payment of the amount due to him. This mortgage interest is certainly interest in immoveable property. By the sale of the equity of redemption this interest of the puisne mortgagee is extinguished. Could it be said in such circumstances that by the sale of the equity of redemption at the instance of the first mortgagee the estate of the puisne mortgagee is being proceeded against ? Though it might appear somewhat farfetched, the sale of the equity of redemption can be regarded as a sale of the estate of the puisne mortgagee also. The decisions relied upon by Kuppuswami Aiyar J. for holding that a puisne mortgagee was also a debtor of the first mortgagee were all decisions which arose on the inter .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ce of the sale and had taken part in the proceeding and obtained adjournment of the sale for enabling them to save the estate of the company in liquidation. The question is whether this conduct would amount to waiver of leave of court enjoined by section 171. The lower court has dealt with this question on the ground of estoppel. But it does not really fall under that category of legal defences. If a party is enabled to waive a pre-requisite to the validity of a proceeding, just as a statutory notice, there is no question of estoppel against that party. The protection given by the statutory requirement may be waived by the party unless some principle like public policy is involved. It is established at least in English law, no decision of I .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e of court obtained for the proceeding in which the sale resulted, and no waiver by the liquidator or by the company of the requirement as to leave, the resulting sale or attachment shall be void. But it could not govern the operation of a case where either leave was obtained or the want of leave was validly waived by the liquidator of the company. In this view, the provisions of section 232 would not apply to this case. We are of opinion, differing from the learned judge in the lower court, that there was effective waiver in this case of want of leave. The conduct of the official liquidator in obtaining adjournment of the sale on more than one occasion for the specific purpose of paying up the decree debt due to the first mortgagee amoun .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates