2001 (2) TMI 678

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . Agrawal, Member (T)]. - M/s. Indicarb Ltd. have come in appeal against the Order No. 186/96 (CBE), dated 15-3-96 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) confirming the adjudication order under which their refund claim was rejected. 2. Shri Koshy Chandi, learned Consultant for the appellants, submitted that as a result of change of classification of Inserts from sub-heading 8 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... to be determined after deducting the duty payable; that as the Department made error in calculating the differential duty admissible to them, the refund of the duty paid in excess is admissible; that additional grounds can be raised at two different stages if the appellate authority is satisfied that the omission of additional ground was neither wilful nor unreasonable. 3. Shri G. Sreekumar Men .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... uty paid by them is as per the order passed by the competent authority, it cannot be challenged in these proceedings on the ground that the said amount was worked out wrongly. The Commissioner (Appeals) has rightly given his findings that this point should have been agitated before the lower authority or the appellate authority where the differential duty was contested by the appellants. The Hon b .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X