TMI Blog2001 (8) TMI 651X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... This is a Misc. Application filed by M/s. Aristo Pharmaceuticals Ltd. for rectification of mistake said to have crept in the Misc. Order No. 8/2001-C, dated 19-1-2001. 2. The Applicants have submitted in their letter dated 14-7-2001 that they do not wish to be represented in the hearing and have requested that the matter he decided on merit on the basis of records. It has been submitted by them ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s not in the said order, it is clear that there was a mistake apparent in the Order No. 8/2001-C, dated 19-1-2001. 3. Opposing the prayer, Shri M.D. Singh, learned SDR, submitted that under Section 35C(2), the Appellate Tribunal may, with a view to rectifying any mistake apparent from the record, amend any order passed under sub-section (1) of Section 35C of the Central Excise Act; that the pres ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... in Section 35C(2) of the Central Excise Act which reads as under :- (2) The Appellate Tribunal may, at any time within four years from the date of the order, with a view to rectifying any mistake apparent from the record, amend any order passed by it under sub-section (1) and shall make such amendments if the mistake is brought to its notice by the Commissioner of Central Excise or the other ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|