2001 (8) TMI 664

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ondent. [Order per : Jyoti Balasundaram, Member (J)]. This appeal is against the order of the Commissioner of Central Excise, Vadodara confirming duty demand of Rs. 53,06,590/- and imposing penalty of Rs. 5 lakhs upon the appellant who are manufacturers of various chemicals. The issue in dispute relates to price list filed by the assessee in Part II and Part VI showing different prices f .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... art VI for the same goods had been approved and therefore question of suppression does not arise so as to apply extended period of limitation. It is the further contention that since Modvat credit could be availed by the sister concern, there can be no intention to evade payment of duty and hence the proviso to Section 11A is not applicable for this reason also. The learned DR opposed the contenti .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X