TMI Blog2001 (10) TMI 408X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Justice K.K. Usha, President]. This is an application for rectification of an alleged mistake in the Final Order Nos. 74 to 112/2001-A passed by the Tribunal on 1-3-2001 [2001 (129) E.L.T. 162 (Tri.)]. 2. We heard the Representative of the applicants as well as the learned Departmental Representative. It is the case of the applicant that in respect ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... i dumping duty. If that be so, the applicant would contend that this Tribunal should have directed refund of the entire amount of anti dumping duty paid by the applicant instead of the difference between the additional duty paid at the rate of Rs. 1700 PMT and Rs. 1253 PMT, which was the final anti dumping duty fixed under Notification No. 4/94, dated 18-1-94. 3. After hearing both sides for som ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|