9911796707
TMI Blog2002 (1) TMI 524X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ber (T)]. All these six appeals have been filed by the Revenue against the Order-in-Appeal Nos. 75 to 90/97 (T)(D) Cus., dated 27-5-97 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Trichy. 2. In the impugned order, the ld. Commissioner (Appeals) had enhanced redemption fine from 50% to 100% on the CIF value only. Aggrieved with this order Revenue has come in appeal on the ground that ma ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... /s. Sunil Traders v. C.C., Trichy vide Final Order Nos. 2022-2025/2001, dt. 12-12-2001 was passed by this Bench. He has therefore prayed that margin of profit being more than 300%, Redemption fine should be at least fixed to the extent of margin of profit and penalty also may be appropriately increased from 10% to the reasonable extent as deemed fit and proper by the Bench. 4. When the matter wa ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... national (supra), and in view of the decision of this Bench in the case of CCE v. Onkar Trading M/s. Sunil Trading (supra) we do not find that it requires any interfere from us. Therefore, we do not find any infirmity in the impugned order passed by the ld. Commissioner (Appeals) and the same is confirmed. All these appeals filed by the Revenue are therefore, rejected. Ordered accordingly. - ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
