2002 (2) TMI 818

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... fter dispensing with the condition of pre-deposit of duty amount of Rs. 6602.75 and personal penalty of Rs. 500/-, I take up the appeal itself. 2. The above amount of duties have been confirmed against the appellants on the ground of clandestine removal of their final product i.e. lubricating oil. As per the appellants, they were reflecting upon the production figure in RG 1 as also in RT 12 ret .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n RG 1 and RT 12 returns, the same will not amount to any clandestine removal. 3. I have also heard Shri A.K. Pandit, ld. JDR for the Revenue. 4. After going through the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), I find that he has observed as under :- I have gone through the case records, the Order-in-Original, the appeal memorandum and the submissions made during personal hearing, I find .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ake on their part. 5. A reading of the above paragraph shows that the wrong maintenance of records by the appellants, has been accepted by the Commissioner (Appeals) but he has not extended the benefit to them on the ground that they have rectified the mistake in non-maintenance of records only prospectively. However, I find that there is no evidence for removal of the appellants final product .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X