9911796707
TMI Blog1996 (1) TMI 342X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... unjab Ltd. v. Nitin Kumar Gupta [Revision Petition No. 11 of 1994] against which order in Revision Petition No. 89 of 1995 has been filed before this Commission. The other revision petitions were disposed of by the State Commission for the reasons stated in the order passed in Revision Petition No. 11 of 1994. Feeling aggrieved against those orders the opposite parties have filed these revision petitions. 2. The facts as gathered from the record are that the respondents in these revision petitions had filed complaints before the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raj an and Gaon, Madhya Pradesh alleging that the share certificates for which they had applied to the present petitioner - company had not been sent to them. The present pe ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... they were entitled to receive the share certificates at Rajanand Gaon, therefore, part of cause of action arose to the various complainants at Rajanand Gaon on account of non-receipt of the share certificates and thus the District Forum at Rajanand Gaon has jurisdiction. The revision petitions filed by the oppo- site party were accordingly dismissed. Feeling aggrieved against those orders these revision petitions have been filed. 6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties we are of the opinion that the State Commission was in error while holding that part of cause of action had arisen at Rajanand Gaon and therefore the District Forum of that place had jurisdiction. Section 11 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 lays down ab ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... has its registered office or from where the shares are to be despatched. Post Office will be deemed to be acting as agent for share holders for delivery of shares to them. As noticed above, the petitioner company has its registered office at Chandigarh while its place of work is at Mandsaur (MP). It has no branch office at Rajanand Gaon. Hence we hold that the District Forum at Rajanand Gaon has no jurisdic-tion to entertain the complaints. Accordingly we accept all the present revision petitions and set aside the orders of the District Forum as well as of the State Commission and dismiss all the complaints forming subject matter of the above revision petitions. No costs. Petitions allowed. SCL q JUNE 1996 - - TaxTMI - TMITax ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
