Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1995 (6) TMI 174

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... stan Levers Ltd. (OP-4) from OPs 1 and 2 on 28-6-1991 for Rs. 28,700. The transaction was through OP-3. On 28-6-1991 itself the complainant handed over a pay order for Rs. 15,800 from out of the total consideration and a cheque for balance amount Rs. 12,900. The complain-ants were given delivery of 100 shares on 28-6-1991 itself and the remain-ing 100 shares were to be delivered on the encashment of the cheque. The cheque was encashed on 29-6-1991. It was however, averred that the complainant further handed over 100 shares out of the above 200 shares to respondent No. 5, who in turn appears to have sold the same to one Mrs. Kanchan Kakkar. As the company (OP 4) declined to transfer the shares on the ground that the signatures of respondent .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r cent per annun and further for directing OP-4 to transfer 100 shares in the name of the complainant. They further prayed that OP - 1 be directed to pay to the complainant the dividend and other benefits declared by OP-4. 2. The complaint was contested. On an appraisal of the material on record and after hearing Counsel for the parties District Forum held as under: ( 1 )that there was no privity of contract between Mr. D.N. Aggarwal, complainant No. 1 and Smt. Kaushalya Devi OP-1 Mr. D.N. Aggarwal had therefore, no right to file the complaint. ( 2 )Smt. Veena Sarpal, OP - 2 did not hold any shares and there was no question of her selling any shares. There was no cause of action against her and she had been wrongly impleaded. ( 3 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... shares, if any, and dividend which was expected to be announced. It was pleaded in the written version filed on behalf of OP -1 that entitlement to bonus shares and dividend had been specifically excluded from the transaction. This is belied by the documents on record. Annexure C is the so-called agreement. There is no dispute that it is signed by Smt. Veena Sarpal, R - 2 on behalf of her mother Smt. Kaushalya Devi, R - 1 on 28-6-1991. It reads as follows : "I am selling 200 shares of Hindustan Lever to Sh. D.N. Aggarwal in consideration of Rs. 28,700 only out of which Rs. 15,800 were paid by him by pay order. Rest Rs. 12,900 by cheque I am delivering him 100 shares and rest one hundred I will deliver after encashment of the above cheque .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r the above consideration I sold hundred shares of Hindustan Lever Ltd. I undertake to sign all the documents to enable the purchaser/ subsequent purchasers and their transfer to get the shares transferred in their name. For the bad delivery, for any reason, I undertake to compensate all the purchasers I shall be abide by Delhi Stock Exchange Rules. Sd (Kaushalya Devi Marwah)" The aforesaid receipt was witnessed by R-3 and R-2 Smt. Veena Sarpal. A perusal of both these documents clearly shows that no exception has been made regarding bonus shares and dividend. On the contrary, the seller R-1 undertook to do all things required in order to effectuate the transfer of the said orders. It was expressly mentioned that for bad delivery f .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... person who is entered as holder of the share certificates is entitled to bonus shares and dividend even though he had sold that particular share prior to the date of the announcement of bonus shares or dividend. The person who is the real owner of the shares on the date of the declaration is entitled to that benefit. If the Company sends the bonus shares and dividend to the shareholder on the basis of the record available with the Company that shareholder holds the bonus shares or dividend as the case may be as a trustee for the transferee in whose favour he or she has already sold the shares. 9. Mr. J.S. Vohra, learned counsel for R-1 vehemently argued that the market rate on 28-6-1991 per share was 163 and the sale price charged was .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates