9911796707
TMI Blog2001 (8) TMI 1078X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... (J)]. By this application, the appellant, Director of Anipack Ltd. named Smt. Padma Asokan has filed this application seeking condonation of delay for more than 1085 days. Ld. Counsel submits that the order was despatched on 15-1-1998 and was received by them on 17-1-1998. They were required to have filed the appeal on 17-4-1998. However, it has been filed on 16-4-2001 and hence the delay. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... developed indifferent attitude by not giving salary and did not attend to the work and he left the services from October, 2000. 2. It is submitted that the Department took the demand action in January, 2001. Till then she was not aware of any action of the present order-in-original. She had to locate the papers and file this appeal after 1085 days which is neither wilful nor wanton, but beyond t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... with the reasons given by the appellant Director of the company. The order-in-original has been passed in December 1997. We notice that no explanation from this date has been given to the satisfaction of the Bench. The reasons should be sufficient, acceptable, bona fide and should be clear. In the present case, there is no explanation at all from the appellant for not having filed the appeal even ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
