2001 (8) TMI 1091

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Shri A.K. Jain, DR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Gowri Shankar, Member (T)]. The appellant is a manufacturer of carburettors. It received a consignment of such carburettors from a person from whom they have been supplied for removal of defects in them. It carried out reconditioning of the carburettors and returned them without payment of duty, claiming the benefit of Rule 173H. The d .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... h a duty paying document. Rule 52A, which prescribes such documents and does not distinguish the duty paying nature of the original or duplicate, although it assigns different functions to each of these copies. This objection is therefore not sustainable. 4. As to the second objection, the issue is decided in favour of the assessee by the decision of the Tribunal in Gujarat Transformers Pvt. Ltd .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X