2002 (9) TMI 680

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... llant. S/Shri A. Jayachandran and C. Mani, JDRs, for the Respondent. [Order per : Jeet Ram Kait, Member (T)]. - These two appeals are directed against the respective orders-in-appeal bearing Nos. 254/2001, dt. 10-10-2001 and 213/2001, dt. 21-9-2001 in the matter of M/s. Sathya Shyam Spinners Pvt. Ltd. and M/s. LSPM Spinners P. Ltd. by which the Commissioner (Appeals) has reduced the penalty to .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s, 1944 read with Section 11 AC of Central Excise Act, 1944 though imposable but in the absence of apportionment of penalty under Section 11AC and Rule 173Q, penalty is not sustainable. 3. Heard ld. DR Shri A. Jayachandran for the Revenue who submits that in the case of clandestine removal of the goods, penalty is imposable under Rule 173Q read with Section 9(2) and also mandatory penalty un .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X