TMI Blog2003 (2) TMI 268X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... [Order per : S.S. Kang, Member (J)]. In these appeals the controversy relates to the classification of the processed knitted pile fabrics in running length at the hands of the appellants who are the processors. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the appellants are processors of various Textiles Fabrics and also undertake the job work pertaining to the processing of knitted pile fabric ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... cating authority confirmed the demand and imposed penalty. The appeals filed by the appellants were dismissed by the Commissioner (Appeals). 3. The Divisional Bench of the Tribunal referred the matter to the Larger Bench for considering the following issue : Whether the processed knitted pile fabric at the hands of the processor would be classifiable under Chapter 63 as made-up artic ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... sued to the appellants classifying the fabrics as made-up articles by invoking the provisions of Section Note 5 (f) of Section XI of the CETA. The adjudicating authority confirmed the demand on this ground only. Whereas the Commissioner (Appeals) in the impugned orders after relying upon the Section Note 5(b) of the Section XI of CETA up-held the adjudication order. In this view the contention of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... or in the form of a number of items in the length Section Note 5(b) of Section XI of the CETA : Produced in the finished state, ready for use (or merely needing separation by cutting dividing threads) without sewing or other working (for example, certain dusters, towels, table clothes, scarf squares, blankets) . 10. In both the cases the show cause notices were issued to the appellants sp ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|