Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2003 (9) TMI 377

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... otice for demand as follows was issued :- (i) recover Customs duty amounting to Rs. 20,46,275/- on 3,87,552 L. Mtrs. of Grey fabrics valued at Rs. 46,50,624/- under Section 72 read with proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 28 of Customs Act, 1962; (ii) recover the interest @ 24% per annum on delayed payment of evaded Customs duty under Section 28AB of Customs Act, 1962; (iii) impose penalty under Section 72 read with Section 114A of Customs Act, 1962; (iv) impose penalty upon Shri Rameshchandra Chunnilal Agarwal, Director of Mill under Section 112(b) of Customs Act, 1962. The learned Commissioner after hearing the party concluded that the raw material i.e. Grey Fabric, were bonded goods in terms of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... pter IX of the Customs Act, 1962 as such they were required to follow the provisions of Section 71 of the Customs Act, 1962. Further they were also required to follow the provisions of EXIM Policy and that they should have obtained the prior permission for removal of their duty free raw material from their bonded warehouse from the Development Commissioner. However, they failed to do so. As such they are required to pay the customs duty leviable on the goods so removed/diverted illicitly by them without any permission of the Development Commissioner. As a matter of fact, Central Excise duty becomes recoverable if the raw materials undergo process of manufacture. In the case, the Government has not collected customs duty on goods received fr .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... w materials i.e. yarn and thereafter procured by the appellants for further processing. Therefore, the findings in the Para 14 of Commissioners order (extracted hereinabove at Para (a)) that the goods found short, were warehoused goods cannot be accepted as warehoused goods, are by definition as per the Customs Act are non-duty paid imported goods placed in a Warehouse and can not be goods manufactured in India or from such goods kept in the Warehouse. In this case, Grey fabric, which was manufactured out of imported raw material i.e. yarn in an EOU or from local yarn in a DTA unit and admittedly procured on CT-3 by the appellant EOU cannot be Warehoused Goods, they being goods manufactured in India and not imported non duty paid goods. Suc .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates