9911796707
TMI Blog2002 (12) TMI 509X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 1. Mr. Hemchand Tejwani is simply an Advocate of Respondent No. 1 and as such he himself cannot be a party before the District Forum. He has been unnecessarily and unjustly arrayed as Respond ent No. 2. His name be deleted from the array of Respondent. 2. Since Shri Hemchand Tajwani has stated that he was working as the standing counsel of Respondent No. 1 namely World Link Finance Ltd., J ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s depend ents and also creditors of the Respondent Company. Their cases were also considered by the Company Law Board. The Company Law Board vide order dated 31-3-1999 in the matter of R.B.I. 1934 and in the matter of World Link Finance Ltd. and depositors in the Company laid down a scheme for repayment the amount of the depos itors. According to such scheme the amount refundable to the appellan ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nstalment of the amount of the appellant, as per scheme laid down by the Company Law Board on 1-9-1999. The instalment was not paid by that time. The Respondent might have approached the Company Law Board again and he might be having some good reasons to again approach the Company Law Board. But the question for determination before the District Forum was as to whether the Respondent had rendered ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... down by the Company Law Board on 31-3-1999 and subsequently. After having considered the complaint of the appellant and the objections of the Respondent, the District Forum would decide the matter afresh according to law. Parties are directed to appear before the District Forum on 15-2-2003. 6. The record of the District Forum shall be sent back forthwith. Cost on parties. - - TaxTMI - TMIT ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
