TMI Blog2002 (4) TMI 881X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J) (Oral)]. This stay application and appeal arises from OIA No. 99/2001, dated 31-7-2001 by which the Commissioner (Appeals) has confirmed the Order-in-Original demanding duty of Rs. 1,08,271/- under Section 11A of the Act. As the issue lies in a narrow compass, by granting waiver of pre-deposit of duty and stay of its recovery, we take up the appeal itsel ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... within the definition of waste and scrap and hence no duty is required to be levied. However, both the authorities rejected their plea that there is no finding as to whether the item has satisfied the Section Note 7 of Section XV except to say that it qualifies for demanding duty and it cannot be treated as worn out parts and machineries accumulated over the years due to wear and tear. 3. Ld. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ed by the authorities. 4. Ld. DR submits that the matter is required to be scrutinised again in the light of judgment of the Tribunal. The original authority has to see as to whether waste and scrap has arisen out of manufacture or mechanical working of iron and steel as there is no specific finding on this issue. He seeks for remand of the matter. 5. On a careful consideration of the submis ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|