2003 (10) TMI 448

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the Appellant. Ms. Krishna A. Mishra, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : K.D. Mankar, Member (T)]. - The appeals relate to duty demand on polypropylene yarn manufactured by the appellants, which was captively consumed in the manufacture of the polypropylene narrow woven fabrics. The appellants cleared the said fabrics on payment of duty. Therefore, the appellants did not pay any duty on th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e to duty. Hence, duty has been demanded from the appellants through the impugned orders on the captively consumed yarn. 2. Heard both sides. 3. While in the appeals several issues have been raised, the learned Counsel for the appellants, submits that even in the event it is conceded that the appellants are liable to pay the duty that is demanded on the captively consumed yarn, they ar .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... appellants relates to valuation. It is claimed by the appellants that the yarn captively consumed and that sold to independent customers is qualitatively different hence, price based on costing is correct and that based on sale to independent buyers as adopted by the Deptt. is improper. We find that the assessee had not produced before the authorities below any material to substantiate its conten .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X