9911796707
TMI Blog2003 (11) TMI 433X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Admission hearing in this case was held on 4-11-2003 when the applicant was represented by advocate Shri S. Kantawala. Revenue was represented by Shri Amarnath Kesari, Appraiser from Jawaharlal Nehru Customs House, Sheva, Raigad. The learned advocate stated the following : 2. The applicant filed the B/E No. 743260, dated 14-5-2002 for the clearance of goods declared as Aluminium Tin Strips fa ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y under Customs Tariff heading No. 76 which meant short levy of Rs. 5,31,815/-. 4. The clearance of the goods was allowed provisionally subject to execution of PD Bond backed by Bank Guarantee of 25% of the value. Applicant was also asked to pay duty at the higher rate under Chapter 72. 5. Show Cause Notice dated 29-1-2003 was issued by the Commissioner of Customs (Import) Nhava Sheva inter al ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... as payable the total duty liability of Rs. 16,70,209/- out of which the additional duty liability is Rs. 5,31,815/-. The applicant also conceded to the classification of the goods under Tariff Heading 7212.50. 8. The Revenue vide this office letter dated 29-7-2003 was requested to send the report on the application. The Revenue vide their letter dated 6-8-2003 informed that the case has already ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... pplication, it would not come in the way of admission of the application, in terms of the definition of the case as given in Section 127A(b) of the Customs Act, 1962. The said adjudication Order becomes nonest with the admission of the application. The additional duty liability admitted in this case is a sum of Rs. 5,31,815/-. The applicant has already deposited a sum of Rs. 16,70,209/-, which i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
