9911796707
TMI Blog2004 (4) TMI 339X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : V.K. Agrawal, Member (T)]. This is an application of M/s. Kanchan Industries for restoration of their appeals, which were dismissed for non-compliance with the Stay Order Nos. 453-60/91-WRB, dated 13-11-1991. 2. Shri B.L. Narasimhan, learned Advocate submitted that the Tribunal vide Stay Order, dated 13-11-1991 had directed M/s. Kanchan Industries ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... not filed the application for restoration of the appeals earlier as the order of the CEGAT dismissing the appeal was misplaced. 3. Opposing the prayer Ms. Charul Barnwal, learned Senior Departmental Representative, submitted that the appeals were dismissed in 1998 whereas the restoration application has been filed after almost 3 years and no satisfactory reason has been advanced by the applican ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he applicants have not complied with the Stay Order which now is not the factual position as the applicants had deposited the amount directed by the Tribunal. Their appeals were not liable to be dismissed for non-compliance with the Stay Order. We, therefore, recall our Final Order Nos. 1476-1483/98-B, dated 23-8-1998 and restore the appeals to their original numbers and post them for regular hear ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
