2006 (12) TMI 225

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... spondent. JUDGMENT (ORAL JUDGMENT) J.N. Patel, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. This company appeal is filed taking exception to the interlocutory order passed by the company judge on February 24, 2006, permitting the respondents to take inspection of the documents sought for and also observed that they will be entitled to take xerox copies at their own cost of the said doc .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ors of the company and to take copies of the same which in no manner causes any prejudice to the appellants. Apart from this, it is also contended that an appeal against an interlocutory order, is not maintainable. In reply, learned counsel appearing for the appellants submitted that the appeal having been admitted by this court, this preliminary issue of maintainability of the appeal does not s .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... denied from taking such inspection of the documents/relevant records and also obtain copies of the same. The question of relevancy does not occur in such a case and the petition filed by the respondents for winding up in which they have raised various issues. Therefore, we do not find that there is any merit in the appeal. The appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs. Learned counsel for .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X